THE BLACK SHIRTS

WHY THE FACE COVER?

Section 121 (family law act) prohibits us from identifying ourselves.
We would gladly step forward and identify ourselves and the abuse
being inflicted on us and our children were it not for corrupt laws
being used to hide the abuse of children and families.

WHY "THE BLACK SHIRTS"

Our members needed a name that would stand out.
A name that immediately identified us when in the public arena.
We think its much better than the names given to loving fathers
by other gutless members of the legal fraternity.

In spite of the fact that we live in a Christian democracy, or at least we are led to believe that we live in a Christian democracy, here are two examples on how the Chief Justice and the family court have interpreted the terms:

"Christian Democracy and The Family Unit"

Case 1

A father's application to the family court was to have contact to his two sons. The family court rejected the application even though there were no allegations of any wrong drawing towards his children. The presiding judge noted that the father had great love for his children. The only criteria for the father to comply with was that he first change his attitude towards his wife's partner and companion.

The father could not change his attitude towards the wife's partner and companion as that would be to accept and teach adultery, the breakdown of the family unit and the corruption of the marriage, to his own children. This father was a practicing Catholic. The result was that the father did not have contact with his children for over 10 years. So much for a Christian democracy.

Case 2

A father made application to the family court to enforce existing family court orders for contact with his son. The family court set aside all existing orders and ordered psychiatric assessment for his son and himself. The psychiatrist made recommendations that the father not associate or be a member of an organisation called "the black shirts" this was a pre requisite to supervised telephone calls and one hour of contract.

The father claimed his democratic right to be a member of any organisation he chose. The family court did not allow him to challenge this issue and no proof was provided of any wrong doing by the named organisation. The father's application was dismissed. This father has not seen his son for more than nine months. So much for democracy and freedom of will.

We could list hundreds if not thousands of such cases and those who have tasted the poison of
the system know only too well that the above two cases are not only believable but also very true.

These actions by family court judges are supported by corrupt legislation. Society pays dearly for the privilege, to the tune of over one hundred million dollars per year, with the overall expenditure relating to the so called family breakdown, rising each year with over fifty thousand divorces rising to over 9 billion dollars.

This money should be spent on families, the elderly, children and the welfare of the nation.

The black shirts are proud to oppose the current legislation
and the attitudes and actions of judges of the family court.

The children of Australia are in desperate need of rescue
from this Government's blatant abuse of power.

We invite all loving parents to join us in our fight to protect
the traditional family unit and our precious children.

For more information (the truth) go to www.blackshirts.info